A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a long way they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't imply that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These kinds of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous noticed.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon via the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined with the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of sooner or later from the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness on the alleged occurrence as well as prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to generally be the real brothers with the deceased but they didn't respond in any way towards the confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of events that extra judicial confession of the accused is usually a weak style of evidence which can be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is likewise counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light within the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners collectively on a motorcycle at 4.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and considering the fact that only the appellants were posted at the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
Utilize the PACER Case Locator if you are not confident which specific federal court the case was filed. You might also conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in the federal case. This database updates at midnight day after day.
Reasonable grounds can be obtained within the record to attach the petitioner with the commission on the alleged offence. Though punishment from the alleged offence does not fall from the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising away from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is inside the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case on the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even inside the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steerage has long been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
P.C. Liability of petitioners with the said offences would be determined from the realized trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value on the material generated before the same. Till then, case of
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears along with a new system is place in its place.
In some jurisdictions, case law may be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
ninety . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is additionally important to note that neither seniority nor more info promotion may be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual duration of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for turning into entitled to generally be regarded as for promotion to the higher grade, of course, is not without logic as being the officer who is to begin with inducted into a particular post needs to provide about the claimed post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in a very befitting method.
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does deliver for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.